Banner Corporation’s low-beta deposit franchise, strong capital, and Pacific Financial merger support attractive five-year compounding despite near-term expense and integration pressure.
Banner Corporation operates as the bank holding company for Banner Bank, a Washington-chartered commercial bank founded in 1890 and headquartered in Walla Walla, Washington [cite: 1, 2]. The organization has built a significant regional franchise throughout the Western United States, actively serving consumer and business clients across Washington, Oregon, California, and Idaho [cite: 1, 3]. Operating under its signature "Super Community Bank" model, the institution successfully bridges the gap between sophisticated, large-scale financial product suites and the relationship-driven, localized service typical of community banks [cite: 4, 5].
The primary mechanism of revenue generation is the classic net interest income engine, which historically accounts for approximately 86.8% of total revenue [cite: 6]. This income is derived by capturing the spread between interest earned on a diversified loan and securities portfolio and the interest paid to depositors [cite: 6, 7]. The deposit base consists predominantly of low-cost core deposit accounts [cite: 5]. The remaining revenue is generated through non-interest income sources, primarily deposit fees, service charges, mortgage banking operations, and bank-owned life insurance [cite: 6, 7].
The core products and services encompass a full array of retail and commercial offerings [cite: 2]. On the lending side, the portfolio is structured across commercial real estate, commercial and industrial business loans, residential construction, agricultural credit, and consumer financing [cite: 2, 8]. Liability products include non-interest-bearing checking accounts, relationship transaction accounts, savings deposits, and certificates of deposit [cite: 5]. Additionally, the institution actively services loans for third parties, generating a steady stream of fee-based service income [cite: 4].
The primary customer base consists of small-to-medium-sized businesses, agricultural producers, commercial real estate investors, housing developers, and regional retail consumers [cite: 3, 5]. The most critical end markets are concentrated in localized commercial commerce, regional real estate construction, structural multi-family development, and the agricultural valleys of the Pacific Northwest [cite: 4, 9].
Clients choose this institution over national money-center competitors due to its local decision-making structure, rapid credit approval processes, and high trust levels [cite: 5, 10]. This is evidenced by its top ranking in the Northwest region for customer satisfaction in the J.D. Power U.S. Retail Banking Satisfaction Study [cite: 10].
| State & Territory | Number of Branch Locations | Percentage of Network (%) | Population Per Branch Location | Average Customer Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington | 69 | 49.3% | 111,428 | 4.0 |
| California | 31 | 22.1% | 1,269,552 | 4.2 |
| Oregon | 31 | 22.1% | 136,431 | 3.9 |
| Idaho | 9 | 6.4% | 206,012 | 4.0 |
| Total United States | 140 | 100.0% | N/A | 4.0 |
Note: Data represents the branch distribution as of February 2026, showcasing the heavy structural focus on Washington state [cite: 11].
To evaluate the core economic engine of the institution, an investor must understand the structural composition of what is actually being sold [cite: 4]. Outstanding loan assets are anchored by commercial real estate (CRE) loans, which comprise 35% of the total loan portfolio [cite: 5]. This exposure is balanced between owner-occupied commercial properties (10% of total loans) and non-owner-occupied investment real estate (15% of total loans) [cite: 5]. Commercial and agricultural lending represents 24% of the book, providing critical lines of credit, inventory funding, and equipment financing to middle-market businesses and regional growers [cite: 5, 12].
Residential mortgages make up 13% of the portfolio, while construction and land development loans constitute 15% [cite: 5]. The construction portfolio is highly localized, focusing on residential construction (5% of total loans) and regional infrastructure development [cite: 12]. Multi-family real estate loans make up 7%, and retail consumer loans represent the final 6% [cite: 5].
On the liability side, deposit products are designed to generate stable, low-cost liquidity [cite: 5]. The transaction deposit mix is highly favorable, with interest-bearing transaction and savings accounts representing 56% of total deposits, non-interest-bearing checking accounts representing 33%, and higher-cost certificates of deposit restricted to just 11% [cite: 5]. Furthermore, the company services $3.14 billion of loans for third-party institutional investors, generating recurring fee streams and escrow deposit balances that support low-cost balance-sheet funding [cite: 4].
The competitive advantage of the institution is defined by several structural factors:
The structural addressable market comprises the banking needs of commercial entities, agricultural operations, and individual consumers across the high-growth corridors of the Pacific Northwest and the Western United States [cite: 1, 3]. To capture market share in Washington and Oregon, the organization entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire Pacific Financial Corporation (OTCQX: PFLC), the parent company of Bank of the Pacific, in an all-stock transaction [cite: 15, 16].
Under the merger terms, each share of Pacific Financial common stock will convert into 0.2633 shares of Banner common stock [cite: 17]. Based on Pacific Financial's outstanding shares and restricted stock units, the transaction is valued at approximately $177 million [cite: 17]. The acquisition adds Bank of the Pacific’s low-cost deposit franchise ($1.10 billion in deposits, 38% of which are non-interest-bearing, with an average deposit cost of 1.03%) and its commercial loan book ($762 million in loans) [cite: 18, 19].
Upon closing, the combined organization will control approximately $18 billion in total assets [cite: 15, 19]. This transaction expands branch density in attractive Western Washington and Western Oregon markets, while giving acquired customers access to larger commercial lending limits and modern digital banking tools [cite: 18].
The competitive environment is divided into three tiers: national money-center institutions (such as JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo), large regional commercial banks (such as Columbia Banking System and East West Bancorp), and localized community banks (such as Heritage Financial) [cite: 20, 21, 22].
| Financial Parameter | Banner Corp (BANR) | Columbia Banking (COLB) | East West Bancorp (EWBC) | Heritage Financial (HFWA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Scale ($B) | $16.59B [cite: 13] | $66.80B [cite: 23] | N/A | N/A |
| Trailing P/E Multiple | 11.71x [cite: 20] | 12.16x [cite: 20] | 12.59x [cite: 20] | 13.81x [cite: 20] |
| 1-Year EPS Growth (%) | +15.7% [cite: 20] | -9.8% [cite: 20] | +14.2% [cite: 20] | +57.9% [cite: 20] |
| 5-Year EPS Growth (%) | +11.5% [cite: 20] | +1.3% [cite: 20] | +19.1% [cite: 20] | +9.1% [cite: 20] |
| Net Interest Margin (%) | 4.13% [cite: 13] | ~3.96% [cite: 24] | N/A | N/A |
The data indicates the bank is maintaining its market share and holding its ground against larger regional consolidators [cite: 5]. While Columbia Banking System (COLB) has achieved a larger asset footprint through mergers, it has faced integration challenges, resulting in negative one-year earnings growth (-9.8%) and a lower net interest margin [cite: 20, 24].
The bank's disciplined pricing strategy and low-cost funding base have allowed it to generate superior interest spreads and stable profitability metrics compared to both larger regional and smaller community bank peers [cite: 5, 20].
The institution announced its second-quarter 2026 financial results for the period ending June 30, 2026, on Wednesday, July 22, 2026 [cite: 1, 13]. The results demonstrated stable balance-sheet metrics alongside near-term non-interest expense headwinds [cite: 13, 25]:
The results presented a mixed outcome relative to Wall Street expectations:
Management made no major changes to its long-term financial guidance on the earnings call. The organization reaffirmed its full-year 2026 guidance targeting mid-single-digit organic loan growth across its commercial and consumer portfolios [cite: 14]. Management also reconfirmed that the definitive all-stock merger with Pacific Financial Corporation remains on target to close in the third quarter of 2026, subject to final regulatory approvals [cite: 14, 19].
During the earnings webcast, CEO Mark Grescovich noted that the quarter benefited from robust loan growth, but this was offset by elevated non-interest expenses associated with technology investments [cite: 25]. The bank completed its migration to a new loan and deposit origination system, which is expected to support future loan volumes [cite: 5, 25].
The higher-than-expected operating expenses ($108.0 million) included a one-time $924,000 write-off of the old legacy origination system and $238,000 in transaction costs related to the pending Bank of the Pacific merger [cite: 29]. CFO Robert G. Butterfield highlighted that the new origination platform automates back-office processes and speeds up turnaround times, which should improve operating efficiency in the coming quarters [cite: 14].
Following the Q2 2026 earnings miss, the stock declined approximately 1.16% to 1.58%, closing at $68.52 as investors reacted to near-term margin and cost pressures [cite: 14, 27]. However, the stock quickly stabilized around the $69.00 to $70.00 range, which is near the upper bound of its 52-week trading range of $57.05 to $72.65, indicating that investors viewed the earnings miss as a temporary issue [cite: 6, 14, 21].
Wall Street analysts kept their ratings neutral, and the consensus price target held steady at $73.67 [cite: 30]. Individual analyst price targets ranged from $67.00 (Matthew Clark, Piper Sandler) to $75.00 (Kelly Motta, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods), suggesting limited near-term valuation adjustments following the announcement [cite: 31].
The bank’s valuation is closely tied to its strong capital ratios, high asset quality, and its net interest margin advantage [cite: 5]. As of August 13, 2026, the stock closed at $73.69 [cite: 1, 32].
| Valuation Metric | Value | Analytical Relevance & Core Business Connection |
|---|---|---|
| Current Stock Price | $73.69 | Closing quote on August 13, 2026 [cite: 1, 32]. |
| Trailing P/E Multiple (LTM) | 11.62x – 12.11x | Based on trailing EPS of $6.06 to $6.10, reflecting a slight premium to peer averages [cite: 33, 34, 35]. |
| Forward P/E Multiple (FWD) | 11.41x – 11.84x | Evaluated against consensus forward-year EPS estimates of $6.19 [cite: 21, 33]. |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B) | 1.25x | Book value per share stands at $58.83 [cite: 33]. |
| Price-to-Tangible Book (P/TBV) | 1.54x | Tangible book value per share is $47.82, showing strong capital returns [cite: 6, 13]. |
| Dividend Yield (FWD) | 2.83% – 2.99% | Yield based on a declared quarterly cash dividend of $0.52 per share [cite: 13, 14, 33]. |
| 5-Year Sales Growth CAGR | 3.1% | Compounded annual revenue growth rate over the last five fiscal years [cite: 6]. |
| Tangible Book Value Growth | 5.3% | Five-year annual compounded growth rate of tangible common equity [cite: 6]. |
Connecting valuation directly to the business model shows that the bank historically trades at a premium to standard regional banking peers (averaging a trailing P/E of 10.8x in peer groups) due to its high core deposit concentration [cite: 13, 36]. The 89% core deposit ratio reduces funding volatility, allowing the bank to maintain high returns on average assets (1.20% in Q2 2026) and exceptional return on tangible common equity (12.27%) [cite: 13, 14].
The bank’s premium valuation is supported by its strong core deposit base [cite: 5]. Relationship-driven checking and transaction accounts (89% of deposits) provide a low-cost, stable funding source that protects the net interest margin from rising deposit rates [cite: 5, 13]. The 5-year sales growth CAGR of 3.1% reflects a disciplined approach to loan pricing, preferring to protect credit quality and interest margins rather than pursuing higher-risk, lower-yield loan volumes [cite: 5, 6].
The primary near-term execution challenge is the operational integration of Pacific Financial Corporation and its operating unit, Bank of the Pacific [cite: 18, 37]. Management has targeted cost-reduction initiatives designed to eliminate 40% of Bank of the Pacific’s non-interest expenses, which represents approximately $16.4 million in annualized cost savings [cite: 18, 19]. Successfully extracting these synergies requires closing redundant branch locations, combining back-office processing teams, and integrating core IT networks [cite: 19].
An early warning sign of integration friction would be an increase in combined operating expenses or a rise in client and employee attrition [cite: 8]. Furthermore, the $25.5 million in expected one-time merger-related expenses could exceed initial models, which would weigh on near-term tangible common equity ratios [cite: 18, 19].
The Pacific Northwest banking market is highly competitive for relationship deposits [cite: 38, 39]. To defend deposit volumes, the bank may be forced to raise deposit interest rates, causing its historical funding advantage to erode [cite: 29, 40].
A flattening or inverted treasury yield curve represents a major structural headwind [cite: 27]. It compresses the net interest margin by limiting loan yield expansion while funding costs remain elevated [cite: 27]. An early warning sign of this risk would be a sequential decline in the net interest margin below 3.90%.
The asset portfolio has a notable concentration in commercial real estate (CRE) and residential construction lending, which collectively comprise 50% of the loan book [cite: 5]. While the bank emphasizes a diversified underwriting approach across sub-sectors and geographies, a structural downturn in Western commercial real estate values or regional housing markets would lead to rising charge-offs [cite: 4].
The agricultural lending portfolio (part of the 24% commercial/ag segment) is also exposed to weather-related volatility and changes in federal trade policy [cite: 5, 39]. An early warning sign of portfolio stress would be an increase in delinquent loans (which stood at 0.51% in Q2 2026) or a rise in adversely classified assets [cite: 12].
[Adversely Classified Assets] ──(Sustained Increase)──► [Required Provisions Spike] ──► [Erosion of Net Income]
As a banking institution, the organization is subject to changing regulatory mandates, capital requirements, and consumer protection laws [cite: 4, 39]. Following the close of the Pacific Financial merger, the combined asset base will cross the $18.0 billion threshold [cite: 15, 19].
While still well below the major $50.0 billion and $100.0 billion regulatory asset thresholds, crossing $10.0 billion historically triggers the Durbin Amendment pricing caps on interchange fees [cite: 18]. Management explicitly models a $1.4 million loss of annualized pre-tax interchange fee income as a direct result of these caps, and further growth will invite heightened regulatory compliance costs [cite: 18].
The business model is highly sensitive to the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy decisions [cite: 39]. A rapid transition to a rate-cutting environment would reprice asset yields downward faster than core deposits reprice, leading to net interest margin compression. Conversely, a higher-for-longer interest rate scenario puts stress on commercial debt service coverage ratios, which could elevate non-performing assets [cite: 12, 27].
Additionally, regional macro trends such as shifting technology-sector employment in the Pacific Northwest or agricultural tariff policy could impact local loan demand and deposit growth [cite: 39, 41].
This five-year forecasting model evaluates the potential total return profile of the bank through the end of fiscal year 2031 [cite: 43]. The modeling framework uses the current share price of $73.69 and an annualized starting dividend of $2.08 [cite: 43]. The base scale assumptions assume a starting combined asset footprint of approximately $18.00 billion, a starting loan portfolio of $12.75 billion, starting combined deposits of $14.90 billion, and starting annualized non-interest income of $80.0 million following the Bank of the Pacific integration [cite: 19, 43].
The net interest income (NII) is modeled by scaling interest-earning assets, which represent approximately 90% of total assets, and applying the projected Net Interest Margin ($\text{NIM}$):
$\text{Assets}{Y5} = \text{Assets}_0 \times (1 + g)^5$}
$\text{NII}{Y5} = (\text{Assets}$} \times 0.90) \times \text{NIM
The total revenue ($\text{TR}$) is the sum of $\text{NII}$ and scaled non-interest income ($\text{NII}_{\text{non}}$), growing at a conservative 3% annual compound rate:
$\text{TR}{Y5} = \text{NII} \times (1.03)^5$} + \text{NII}_{\text{non}
Operating expenses are calculated using the projected efficiency ratio ($\text{ER}$), and provisions for credit losses ($\text{P}$) are modeled as a percentage of Year 5 loans:
$\text{Opex}{Y5} = \text{TR}$} \times \text{ER
$\text{Provisions}{Y5} = \text{Loans}$} \times \text{Provision Rate
$\text{Net Income}{Y5} = (\text{TR}} - \text{Opex{Y5} - \text{Provisions})$}) \times (1 - \text{Tax Rate
$\text{with } \text{Tax Rate} = 0.18 \quad \text{(historical effective tax rate)} \quad [cite: 43]$
This scenario assumes stable, moderate growth and successful integration of the Bank of the Pacific [cite: 43, 44]:
* Operating Drivers: Loan growth Compounds at 4.0% annually, reaching a loan book of $15.51 billion and total assets of $21.90 billion by Year 5 [cite: 43]. The tax-equivalent NIM stabilizes at a solid 3.95% [cite: 43]. The efficiency ratio remains controlled at 58.5%, supported by technology-driven cost savings, while credit provisions are modeled at 0.15% of outstanding loans [cite: 43].
* Operating Bridge:
* $\text{NII} = \$778.5\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Non-Interest Income} = \$92.7\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Total Revenue} = \$871.3\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Operating Expenses} = \$509.7\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Provisions} = \$23.3\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Pre-Tax Income} = \$338.3\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Net Income} = \$277.4\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* Valuation & Exit: Share count is assumed at 35.0 million [cite: 43]. Diluted EPS is projected at $7.93 [cite: 43]. Applying a standard historical bank exit P/E multiple of 11.5x yields a future share price of $91.15 [cite: 43].
* Total Return Bridge: Cumulative dividends over 5 years (at a 4% growth rate) are projected at $11.72 [cite: 43]. The total 5-year return is 39.59%, yielding a 6.90% annualized return [cite: 43].
This scenario assumes robust economic expansion in the Western states, higher-for-longer NIM, and rapid synergy extraction [cite: 12, 43]:
* Operating Drivers: Loan compounding accelerates to 7.0% annually, driving loans to $17.88 billion and assets to $25.25 billion [cite: 43]. Strong deposit retention expands the NIM to 4.25% [cite: 43]. High operating efficiency lowers the efficiency ratio to 55.0%, and pristine credit quality reduces loan provision requirements to just 0.08% [cite: 43].
* Operating Bridge:
* $\text{NII} = \$965.7\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Non-Interest Income} = \$92.7\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Total Revenue} = \$1,058.4\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Operating Expenses} = \$582.1\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Provisions} = \$14.3\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Pre-Tax Income} = \$462.0\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Net Income} = \$378.8\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* Valuation & Exit: Active capital returns reduce the share count to 33.0 million [cite: 43]. Diluted EPS rises to $11.48 [cite: 43]. Driven by strong performance, the market assigns a premium exit P/E multiple of 13.5x, leading to a future share price of $154.97 [cite: 43].
* Total Return Bridge: Cumulative dividends (growing at 8% annually) reach $13.18 [cite: 43]. The total 5-year return is 128.19%, equating to a 17.94% annualized return [cite: 43].
This scenario models a prolonged regional real estate downturn, compression of the yield curve, and elevated credit defaults [cite: 4, 43]:
* Operating Drivers: Loan growth slows to a sluggish 1.0% annual compound rate, resulting in a loan book of $13.40 billion and total assets of $18.92 billion [cite: 43]. Severe deposit competition compresses the NIM to 3.50% [cite: 43]. Operational cost creep degrades the efficiency ratio to 64.0%, and rising loan defaults drive credit provisions to 0.40% [cite: 43].
* Operating Bridge:
* $\text{NII} = \$595.9\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Non-Interest Income} = \$92.7\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Total Revenue} = \$688.7\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Operating Expenses} = \$440.7\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Provisions} = \$53.6\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Pre-Tax Income} = \$194.3\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* $\text{Net Income} = \$159.3\text{ million}$ [cite: 43]
* Valuation & Exit: Share count expands to 36.5 million due to stock issuance and limited buybacks [cite: 43]. Diluted EPS contracts to $4.37 [cite: 43]. Due to depressed sentiment, the exit P/E multiple falls to 9.0x, resulting in a future share price of $39.29 [cite: 43].
* Total Return Bridge: Dividends are flat-lined, resulting in cumulative dividends of $10.40 [cite: 43]. The total 5-year return is -32.57%, representing a -7.58% annualized return [cite: 43].
| Scenario | Revenue / key scale metric in Year 5 | Margin / earnings assumption | Valuation multiple assumption | Current share price | Implied future share price | 5-year total return | Annualized return | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Case | \$1,058.4M Total Revenue [cite: 43] | \$11.48 EPS [cite: 43] | 13.5x exit P/E [cite: 43] | \$73.69 USD [cite: 1, 43] | \$154.97 USD [cite: 43] | 128.19% [cite: 43] | 17.94% [cite: 43] | 25.0% [cite: 43] |
| Base Case | \$871.3M Total Revenue [cite: 43] | \$7.93 EPS [cite: 43] | 11.5x exit P/E [cite: 43] | \$73.69 USD [cite: 1, 43] | \$91.15 USD [cite: 43] | 39.59% [cite: 43] | 6.90% [cite: 43] | 60.0% [cite: 43] |
| Low Case | \$688.7M Total Revenue [cite: 43] | \$4.37 EPS [cite: 43] | 9.0x exit P/E [cite: 43] | \$73.69 USD [cite: 1, 43] | \$39.29 USD [cite: 43] | -32.57% [cite: 43] | -7.58% [cite: 43] | 15.0% [cite: 43] |
By combining the projected future share prices based on their respective subjective probability weights:
$\text{Expected Future Share Price} = (0.25 \times \$154.97) + (0.60 \times \$91.15) + (0.15 \times \$39.29) = \$99.33 \text{ USD}$
This probability-weighted mathematical valuation implies a solid upward capital trajectory over the next 5 years, supported by structural dividend returns [cite: 43].
STABLE COMPOUNDING VALUE.
To evaluate the qualitative and operational profile of the bank, this analysis assigns scores on a scale of 1 to 10 across ten core metrics:
[Management Alignment] ████████ 8
[Revenue Quality] ███████ 7
[Market Position] ████████ 8
[Growth Outlook] ███████ 7
[Financial Health] █████████ 9
[Business Viability] ████████ 8
[Capital Allocation] ████████ 8
[Analyst Sentiment] ██████ 6
[Profitability] ████████ 8
[Track Record] ████████ 8
──────────
[Blended Total Score] ████████ 7.7 / 10
This blended qualitative evaluation reflects a structurally solid financial institution with high capital adequacy, strong core margins, and aligned management, though currently experiencing near-term integration and expense pressures [cite: 13, 25, 29].
FRANCHISE STRENGTH CONFIRMED.
The long-term investment thesis for the bank is supported by its cheap, relationship-based deposit franchise and its disciplined credit culture [cite: 5, 29]. Under its Super Community Bank model, the organization has built a highly loyal customer base [cite: 4, 5, 25]. This is reflected in its high core deposit concentration of 89%, which limits deposit beta sensitivity and supports a net interest margin (4.13%) that ranks in the upper tier of the regional banking sector [cite: 13, 29].
While near-term financial performance has faced headwinds from technology integration costs and M&A expenses, these investments in digitization (such as the new loan/deposit origination system) are expected to improve operating efficiency over the long term [cite: 5, 14, 25]. The upcoming acquisition of Pacific Financial Corporation is expected to expand branch density in attractive Western Washington and Western Oregon markets, bringing low-cost deposit funding and immediate EPS accretion once fully integrated [cite: 18, 19].
With robust capital ratios (CET1 of 12.82%), low non-performing assets (0.36%), and a balanced capital return strategy through dividends and share buybacks, the bank represents a high-quality regional banking asset [cite: 13, 49]. The valuation is supported by solid underlying fundamentals [cite: 29]. The organization is well-positioned to compound tangible common equity and navigate changing macroeconomic environments, suggesting the stock may be undervalued relative to its long-term regional franchise value [cite: 29, 36].
VALUATION REMAINS ATTRACTIVE.
The stock exhibits positive medium-to-long-term technical momentum, with its current share price of $73.69 trading above both its 50-day simple moving average ($69.83) and its 200-day simple moving average ($68.61) [cite: 1, 32, 52]. Daily technical indicators, including a 14-day RSI of 56.9 and a positive MACD of 0.07, support a stable, bullish trend [cite: 52]. Short-term trading ranges are expected to remain consolidated within the $70.00 to $74.00 range as the market monitors the regulatory closing and integration milestone updates of the Bank of the Pacific merger in the third quarter of 2026 [cite: 9, 19, 32].
STRONG BULLISH TREND.
View Banner Corporation (BANR) stock page
Loading the interactive version of this report…