Hess Midstream: High-Quality Midstream Income Amid Chevron-Induced Uncertainty
Hess Midstream LP (HESM) operates as a fee-based, growth-oriented midstream limited partnership with a strategically concentrated asset base. The company's core business involves the ownership, operation, development, and acquisition of an integrated portfolio of midstream assets that provide essential services for the transportation and processing of crude oil, natural gas, and produced water. HESM's operational footprint is located almost exclusively in the prolific Bakken and Three Forks Shale plays within the Williston Basin of North Dakota, one of North America's most significant crude oil gathering basins.
The business is structured across three primary operating segments that create a comprehensive value chain for its customers. The Gathering segment consists of a network of pipelines that collect crude oil, natural gas, and produced water directly from wellheads. The Processing and Storage segment is responsible for processing natural gas to remove impurities and separate natural gas liquids (NGLs), as well as providing crude oil storage services. Finally, the Terminaling and Export segment facilitates the movement of crude oil and NGLs to downstream markets through its terminaling facilities.
A defining characteristic of Hess Midstream's business model is its symbiotic relationship with its primary sponsor and customer, Hess Corporation. Following a major corporate transaction that closed in July 2025, Hess Corporation became a subsidiary of Chevron Corporation, making the supermajor HESM's ultimate anchor shipper. This relationship is governed by a suite of long-term, 100% fee-based commercial agreements that extend through 2033. These contracts are specifically designed to insulate HESM's revenue streams from the direct volatility of commodity prices, providing a high degree of cash flow predictability.
The central investment proposition for Hess Midstream is anchored in the stability and visibility of these contractually secured, fee-based cash flows. This financial foundation supports a robust distribution yield and a clearly articulated, multi-year growth trajectory driven by its sponsor's development plans in the Bakken. However, this profile is balanced against a significant and newly emerged set of risks, most notably the uncertainty surrounding the strategic priorities of its new parent, Chevron, and the potential for integration challenges that could alter the long-term outlook for the Bakken assets that HESM serves.
The strategic foundation of Hess Midstream is built upon a resilient and transparent business model designed to generate stable, long-term cash flows. This strategy is executed through a combination of a robust contractual framework, targeted growth initiatives funded by a disciplined capital program, and a set of competitive advantages stemming from its strategic asset base and financial policies.
The primary driver of HESM's financial performance is its unique and comprehensive set of commercial agreements with its anchor shipper. This contractual architecture serves as a formidable economic moat, providing a level of revenue security that is differentiated within the midstream sector.
100% Fee-Based Structure: All of Hess Midstream's revenues are generated from fees charged for the volumes of crude oil, natural gas, and produced water that are gathered, processed, or terminaled through its asset base. This structure is a critical element of the company's strategy, as it effectively decouples its financial results from the direct impact of fluctuations in commodity prices, such as West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil or Henry Hub natural gas. The company operates as a "toll road" for energy molecules, earning revenue based on throughput rather than the market value of the commodity itself.
Long-Term Contracts: The commercial agreements underpinning HESM's operations are exceptionally long-dated, extending through the year 2033. This long-term horizon provides an unparalleled level of visibility into future revenue streams, allowing management to engage in multi-year financial planning and provide clear guidance on capital returns to shareholders.
Minimum Volume Commitments (MVCs): The cornerstone of HESM's downside protection mechanism is the inclusion of Minimum Volume Commitments in its contracts. These MVCs are established on a rolling three-year forward basis and are currently set through 2027. They function as a "send or pay" provision, obligating the customer (now Chevron) to either ship a pre-determined minimum volume of product through HESM's systems or pay the equivalent fee as if that volume had been shipped. For the full year 2025, it is estimated that approximately 80% of HESM's revenues are protected by these MVCs. This provides a strong and reliable floor for cash flows, significantly mitigating the risk of a revenue shortfall even in a scenario where upstream production temporarily declines.
Inflation Protection: To safeguard against the erosion of purchasing power over the long life of its contracts, the agreements include a fee escalation mechanism. This provision allows for the annual adjustment of fees based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), offering a partial but important hedge against systemic inflation.
The synthesis of these contractual elements creates a revenue stream of exceptionally high quality. However, the stability of this revenue is predicated on the operational and financial performance of a single, highly concentrated source. The entire framework is designed around the development plan of its anchor shipper in the Bakken. Consequently, the ultimate business driver for HESM is not merely the general health of the Bakken basin, but specifically the strategic commitment and capital allocation decisions made by Chevron for its newly acquired Hess assets. Any fundamental change in Chevron's long-term view of the Bakken represents the single most significant variable to HESM's future.
Hess Midstream's growth is directly linked to the upstream production volumes of its sponsor. The company's capital program is therefore strategically designed to support and facilitate this anticipated growth in a disciplined and efficient manner.
Volume-Driven Growth: The company's organic growth is a direct function of increasing throughput on its systems. Management has provided explicit multi-year guidance based on the development plan of its sponsor, projecting approximately 10% growth in oil and gas volumes in 2025. This is expected to be followed by continued, albeit moderating, growth in subsequent years, with gas volumes projected to grow by ~10% in 2026 and ~5% in 2027, and oil volumes by ~5% in both 2026 and 2027. This clear, volume-based growth path provides a transparent basis for forecasting future financial performance.
Disciplined Capital Expenditure: HESM's capital allocation strategy is focused on executing a defined set of expansion projects necessary to accommodate the guided volume growth. The 2025 capital expenditure budget is guided to be in the range of $250 million to $300 million. Major ongoing projects include the expansion of gas compression capacity and the construction of a new gas processing plant, which is expected to be operational in 2027. A key aspect of the company's strategy is that it is able to achieve this growth with relatively modest capital outlays. This is because the foundational infrastructure backbone was established through significant historical investment, allowing current projects to function as incremental, high-return expansions rather than costly greenfield builds.
Beyond its contractual structure, Hess Midstream possesses several competitive advantages that reinforce its market position and financial stability.
Strategic Asset Footprint: HESM's gathering systems, processing plants, and terminaling facilities are strategically located and physically integrated with the core acreage of its sponsor's operations in the Bakken. This creates a highly efficient, basin-specific value chain that establishes significant barriers to entry for potential competitors seeking to serve the same production volumes.
Financial Strength & Policy: The company maintains a strong commitment to financial discipline, explicitly targeting a conservative leverage ratio of 3.0x Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA. Management has outlined a clear pathway to further deleverage, expecting the ratio to fall below 3.0x by the end of 2025 and below 2.5x by the end of 2026. This conservative financial posture, combined with the stability of its fee-based cash flows, underpins a transparent and sustainable capital return policy focused on predictable distribution growth and opportunistic unit repurchases.
An analysis of Hess Midstream's recent financial performance reveals a consistent pattern of growth, strong profitability, and a valuation that reflects both its high-yield characteristics and the market's assessment of its unique risk profile.
Recent financial disclosures from HESM demonstrate the successful execution of its volume-driven growth strategy. A review of quarterly reports through mid-2025 shows a consistent upward trajectory in key financial metrics, directly correlated with rising throughput volumes across its systems. For instance, in the second quarter of 2025, the company reported net income of $179.7 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $316.0 million, both representing sequential increases and underscoring the strong operational leverage inherent in the business model. This performance has been supported by volume growth across all segments, including a 7% year-over-year increase in gas processing and a 9% increase in oil terminaling in Q2 2025.
Historically, the company has demonstrated a strong ability to meet or exceed consensus revenue expectations. Its track record on earnings per share (EPS) has been more varied, with several quarters showing modest deviations from analyst estimates, suggesting some variability in operating expenses, interest costs, or income tax provisions that can affect the bottom line.
For the full year 2025, the company has reaffirmed its guidance, which serves as a critical baseline for forward-looking analysis. Management projects full-year Adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $1,235 million to $1,285 million and Adjusted Free Cash Flow to be between $725 million and $775 million. This guidance reflects an anticipated 11% year-over-year growth in Adjusted EBITDA, signaling continued confidence in the operational momentum of the business.
HESM's financial position is characterized by high profitability and substantial leverage, which is typical for capital-intensive infrastructure assets. As of the latest 10-Q filing on June 30, 2025, the company reported total assets of $4.42 billion, supported against total liabilities of $3.92 billion, including $3.69 billion in long-term debt.
The company's profitability metrics are exceptionally strong. Its EBITDA margin is targeted at approximately 75% and has recently been operating closer to 80%, indicating a highly efficient cost structure. The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of over 21% further highlights the high quality and productivity of its asset base. From a liquidity and solvency perspective, the company's leverage is manageable. The interest coverage ratio of approximately 4.6x demonstrates a sufficient capacity to service its debt obligations from operating cash flow.
| Metric | Value | Source(s) |
| Market Capitalization | ~$7.15 Billion | [6, 11] |
| Enterprise Value | ~$10.86 Billion | |
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | ~12.6x | [6, 10] |
| EV / EBITDA (TTM) | ~9.2x | |
| Dividend Yield | ~8.7% | [12, 13] |
| Net Debt / EBITDA (TTM) | ~3.15x | |
| Interest Coverage | ~4.5x | |
| Return on Invested Capital | ~21.4% | |
| EBITDA Margin | ~75.0% |
As of late October 2025, Hess Midstream's Class A shares trade at approximately $33.85. This corresponds to a total market capitalization of roughly $7.15 billion and an enterprise value (market capitalization plus net debt) of approximately $10.86 billion. On a trailing twelve-month basis, the stock trades at a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 12.6x and an Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple of around 9.2x.
The most prominent feature of HESM's valuation is its high distribution yield, which currently stands at approximately 8.7%. This substantial yield is a primary component of the total return proposition for investors.
The combination of a high dividend yield and a relatively modest P/E multiple suggests that the market is valuing HESM primarily for its income-generating capacity rather than its growth prospects. A company with a clearly guided path for double-digit EBITDA growth in the near term would typically be expected to command a higher valuation multiple. The current valuation implies that investors are either skeptical about the sustainability of the guided growth or are demanding a significant risk premium to compensate for perceived uncertainties. Given the contractual protections that insulate the business from commodity cycles and the clarity of management's guidance, this risk premium is most likely attributable to non-operational factors. The most significant of these are the recent change of control at its sponsor following the Chevron-Hess merger and the negative signal sent by recent insider selling activity. Therefore, the current valuation appears to be a direct reflection of these qualitative overhangs rather than a critique of the company's strong underlying operational and financial performance.
An investment in Hess Midstream involves exposure to a distinct set of company-specific risks, which are amplified by broader macroeconomic trends. The most significant risks are centered on the company's high degree of customer concentration and the recent acquisition of its sponsor by Chevron.
Chevron Merger Integration and Strategy Risk (Primary Risk): The most critical and immediate risk facing HESM is the uncertainty stemming from the integration of Hess Corporation into Chevron. This risk, which was explicitly disclosed as a new material factor in the company's latest 10-Q filing, has several dimensions. First, there is the potential for operational disruption during the integration process, which could affect the pace of development in the Bakken. Second, if Chevron fails to achieve the broader strategic or financial synergies it anticipated from the Hess acquisition, it could lead to a re-evaluation and rationalization of its entire asset portfolio, which could potentially include the Bakken assets. Third, and most importantly, is the risk of a long-term strategic re-alignment. Chevron, as a global energy supermajor, evaluates its capital allocation decisions across a vast and diverse portfolio of international assets. The Bakken shale, which was a core focus for Hess, must now compete for capital against other high-profile Chevron opportunities. A strategic decision by Chevron to allocate capital away from the Bakken and towards other projects would directly undermine HESM's long-term growth thesis, even if near-term MVCs continue to be honored.
Customer Concentration: Hess Midstream is, by its own disclosure, "substantially dependent on Chevron". While Chevron represents a financially robust, investment-grade counterparty, this extreme level of customer concentration means HESM's financial destiny is inextricably linked to the strategic decisions and operational execution of a single customer. Any adverse development affecting Chevron's Bakken operations would have a direct and material impact on HESM.
Operational Risks: As with any midstream operator, HESM is exposed to a range of operational risks. These include potential pipeline ruptures, processing plant downtime due to equipment failure, and the impact of severe weather events in North Dakota, which can disrupt both upstream production and midstream operations.
Bakken Production Outlook: HESM's throughput volumes are a direct function of the production profile of the Bakken shale. The macro backdrop for the basin is generally stable. According to forecasts from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. crude oil production is expected to remain robust, averaging 13.5 million barrels per day in both 2025 and 2026, with the Bakken remaining a key contributing region. This provides a supportive environment for HESM's base volumes.
Commodity Price Environment (Indirect Impact): Although HESM's fee-based model insulates it from direct exposure to commodity prices, the price of oil and gas has a significant indirect influence on the business. A prolonged period of low commodity prices could reduce the economic incentive for producers, including Chevron, to invest capital in new drilling and completion activities. The EIA's October 2025 Short-Term Energy Outlook projects a potentially challenging price environment, with WTI crude oil prices forecast to fall to an average of $62 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2025 and further to $52 per barrel in the first half of 2026. While MVCs provide a buffer, a price environment at these levels, if sustained, would likely pressure producer capital budgets and could slow the pace of Bakken development, creating a headwind to HESM's growth prospects beyond the contractually protected floor.
The interplay between these factors reveals a crucial dynamic. The most significant risk to HESM's long-term value is not a cyclical downturn in oil prices, against which its contracts provide substantial protection. Rather, the primary threat is a secular decline in the strategic importance of the Bakken within Chevron's post-merger global portfolio. A challenging macroeconomic environment, characterized by lower long-term oil price forecasts, could act as a catalyst for this company-specific risk. If lower prices make the Bakken's economic returns less competitive relative to Chevron's other global investment opportunities, it could trigger a strategic pivot away from the basin. This represents a potential long-term threat that may be contributing to the risk premium currently embedded in the company's valuation.
This section presents a five-year scenario analysis to estimate a range of potential total returns for HESM through the end of 2030. The analysis is based on a fundamental financial model with all key inputs and assumptions explicitly stated and sourced. The objective is to derive a fundamentally-justified valuation range for the company in five years, independent of its current market price.
The financial projections are anchored to the company's most recent guidance and publicly available data.
Base Year (2025): The model's starting point is the midpoint of HESM's full-year 2025 guidance: Adjusted EBITDA of $1,260 million, Adjusted Free Cash Flow of $750 million, and Capital Expenditures of $300 million.
Adjusted EBITDA Growth: Growth projections are based on the company's multi-year outlook.
Base Case: Follows company guidance of >10% growth in 2026 and >5% in 2027. This is modeled as 11% in 2026 and 6% in 2027, followed by a tapering growth rate of 4% in 2028, 3% in 2029, and 2% in 2030 to reflect the natural maturation of the basin.
High Case: Assumes a more aggressive development pace by Chevron, resulting in stronger volume growth. This is modeled as 13% growth in 2026 and 8% in 2027, tapering to 3% by 2030.
Low Case: Assumes integration challenges or a strategic shift by Chevron leads to a slowdown in Bakken development. This is modeled as 8% growth in 2026 and 3% in 2027, tapering to 0% growth by 2030.
Capital Expenditures: The Base Case assumes capital expenditures of $300 million in 2025, tapering to $250 million by 2027 as major projects are completed, and then settling at a maintenance level of $200 million annually from 2028 to 2030. High and Low cases utilize similar capital profiles, as these expenditures are largely pre-planned to meet contractual capacity needs.
Distributions per Share (DPS): The model starts with an annualized 2025 DPS of $3.02, based on the most recently announced quarterly distribution of $0.7548.
Base Case: Assumes the company achieves its target of 5% annual DPS growth through 2030.
High Case: Assumes stronger cash flow allows for accelerated 6% annual DPS growth.
Low Case: Assumes 5% annual growth through 2027, after which the distribution is frozen due to slowing growth.
Share Count & Net Debt: The model starts with a total share count of 210.06 million and net debt of approximately $3.71 billion. It is assumed that 50% of Adjusted Free Cash Flow remaining after distributions is used to repurchase shares (at an average price assumed to be the midpoint of the current price and the scenario's target price), and the other 50% is used to reduce net debt. This models the company's stated financial flexibility of over $1.25 billion through 2027.
Terminal Valuation Multiple: The valuation at the end of the forecast period is based on an EV/EBITDA multiple, benchmarked against the current multiple of approximately 9.2x.
Base Case: A terminal multiple of 9.0x is applied, reflecting a stable, mature, high-quality midstream asset.
High Case: A multiple of 10.0x is applied, assuming the market rewards the company for consistent execution, a fortified balance sheet, and clarity on its long-term sponsor relationship.
Low Case: A multiple of 8.0x is applied, reflecting the compression that would likely occur in a scenario of slowing growth and persistent uncertainty regarding its anchor shipper.
The following table outlines the key financial projections for each scenario from 2025 to 2030. All figures are in millions of USD, except for per-share data.
Based on the financial projections and terminal valuation assumptions, the following table details the projected share price and estimated 5-year total return for each scenario. Total return includes the sum of cumulative distributions received over the five-year period and the capital appreciation from the current price of $33.85.
To arrive at a central estimate of value, subjective probabilities are assigned to each scenario. The Base Case is assigned the highest probability, reflecting the company's clear guidance. However, a material weight is assigned to the Low Case to account for the significant uncertainty introduced by the Chevron merger.
High Case Probability: 20%
Base Case Probability: 55%
Low Case Probability: 25%
The probability-weighted 2030 target share price is calculated as:
This analysis suggests a fundamental value approximately 77% above the current share price, driven by steady EBITDA growth, consistent distributions, and the application of a reasonable terminal multiple. Even in the conservative Low Case, the analysis indicates a positive total return, supported by the substantial cash flows and high dividend yield.
Stable Yield, Uncertain Future.
This scorecard provides a systematic rating of Hess Midstream's qualitative attributes. Each factor is scored on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 represents significant weakness and 10 represents exceptional strength. A narrative justification is provided for each score.
| Metric | Score | Narrative Justification |
| Management Alignment | 3/10 | Alignment appears weak. Insider ownership is very low at just 0.16% of the company. More concerning is the pattern of recent, significant insider selling, with no corresponding open-market purchases recorded in the last year.[17, 18, 19] This activity suggests a lack of conviction from insiders regarding the equity's current valuation. Additionally, the Chief Executive Officer, Jonathan Stein, is new to the role, having been appointed in July 2025, which introduces a period of leadership transition.[20, 21] |
| Revenue Quality | 10/10 | The quality of revenue is exceptional and represents a best-in-class attribute. The revenue stream is 100% fee-based under commercial agreements that extend through 2033. The inclusion of Minimum Volume Commitments (MVCs), which protect approximately 80% of 2025 revenues, provides unparalleled cash flow stability and visibility, effectively insulating the company from direct commodity price risk. |
| Market Position | 7/10 | HESM holds a dominant and strategically entrenched market position as the primary integrated midstream service provider for its sponsor's core acreage in the Bakken shale. This creates high barriers to entry for that specific production. However, this strength is also a limitation, as the company's market position is highly concentrated both geographically to the Williston Basin and commercially to a single anchor shipper. |
| Growth Outlook | 8/10 | The company has provided a clear, transparent, and data-backed growth outlook through 2027, driven directly by its sponsor's publicly stated development plans. The growth trajectory, projecting double-digit EBITDA growth in the near term, is highly visible and appears achievable, assuming the sponsor's plans remain intact post-merger. The primary uncertainty is the long-term commitment of the new parent company, Chevron. |
| Financial Health | 7/10 | The company's financial health is solid. While leverage is currently slightly above its long-term target of 3.0x Net Debt/EBITDA, the company has a clear and credible deleveraging pathway supported by strong free cash flow generation. The interest coverage ratio is adequate, and the company has demonstrated consistent access to capital markets for financing needs. |
| Business Viability | 9/10 | The long-term viability of the business is very strong. It is supported by long-duration contracts with a supermajor counterparty (Chevron) and operates assets that are physically integrated and essential to the production of a major U.S. oil basin. The fee-based model ensures durability through commodity price cycles. |
| Capital Allocation | 8/10 | Management has established and consistently executed a clear and shareholder-friendly capital allocation framework. The stated priorities are: first, to maintain a strong balance sheet by adhering to leverage targets; second, to fund a steadily growing distribution; and third, to use excess free cash flow for opportunistic unit repurchases to further enhance shareholder returns. |
| Analyst Sentiment | 4/10 | Current Wall Street sentiment is cautious. The consensus rating among analysts is "Hold." Notably, there have been several recent downgrades from major investment banks, including Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and UBS, in the latter half of 2025.[22, 23, 24] This shift in sentiment likely reflects the market's heightened concern over the uncertainties introduced by the Chevron-Hess merger. |
| Profitability | 9/10 | Profitability is a key strength. The company consistently achieves industry-leading EBITDA margins, targeting approximately 75% and often exceeding that level.[4, 12] A high Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) further demonstrates excellent operational efficiency, disciplined capital spending, and the high quality of its integrated asset base. |
| Track Record | 8/10 | Since its formation, the company has established a consistent and impressive track record of creating shareholder value. It has successfully grown volumes, Adjusted EBITDA, and distributions to shareholders through multiple commodity price downturns, demonstrating the resilience of its contractual business model.[25] |
| Overall Blended Score | 7.3/10 |
Operationally Excellent, Externally Clouded.
The comprehensive analysis of Hess Midstream LP reveals a high-quality midstream operator with a uniquely resilient business model, currently navigating a period of significant external uncertainty. HESM presents a compelling combination of high current income and a visible, contractually supported medium-term growth trajectory. The fundamental soundness of the business is evident in its best-in-class, fee-based contractual framework, which provides exceptional cash flow stability and predictability. This financial foundation supports high operating margins, a strong return on capital, and a clear and consistent policy of returning capital to shareholders through a growing distribution and opportunistic repurchases.
The primary investment thesis for HESM hinges on the perception that the market is currently applying an excessive risk premium due to the uncertainty surrounding the recent acquisition of its sponsor, Hess Corporation, by Chevron. An investment in HESM is therefore an implicit wager that Chevron, as a rational economic actor, will continue to develop its newly acquired, high-quality Bakken assets in a manner consistent with the plans laid out by Hess. Should Chevron provide clear, long-term commitments to the basin, the significant risk premium currently embedded in HESM's valuation could unwind, leading to potential multiple expansion in addition to the returns from the high distribution yield and underlying business growth.
Clarity on Chevron's Bakken Strategy: The most significant potential catalyst would be explicit commentary or capital budget commitments from Chevron's senior management regarding their post-merger, long-term development plans for the Bakken. A clear signal of commitment would be a major de-risking event for HESM and would likely lead to a positive re-rating of the stock.
Consistent Operational and Financial Execution: Continued delivery on its guided volume growth, EBITDA targets, and capital expenditure discipline would reinforce the reliability and strength of the underlying business model, building investor confidence over time.
Accelerated Deleveraging: Achieving its sub-2.5x leverage target ahead of schedule would enhance the company's financial flexibility, potentially allowing for accelerated shareholder returns through larger distribution increases or more aggressive unit buybacks.
Chevron Integration and Strategic Shift: The principal risk remains a strategic pivot by Chevron. If the Bakken is de-prioritized within Chevron's global portfolio in favor of other assets, HESM could be left with a stable but ex-growth cash flow stream. Such a scenario would likely result in significant and permanent compression of its valuation multiple, as the market would no longer price in a growth component.
Sustained Macroeconomic Headwinds: A prolonged period of very low crude oil prices (e.g., below $50 per barrel) could eventually impact the economics of Bakken development to a degree that even a supermajor like Chevron would be forced to curtail investment, slowing growth below currently anticipated levels.
In summary, Hess Midstream appears to be a high-quality, durable midstream asset trading at a reasonable valuation that offers a compelling and well-covered dividend yield. The investment question is whether the stability of its cash flows and its visible growth profile are sufficient to compensate for the material, albeit difficult to quantify, risk associated with its dependence on the strategic decisions of its new corporate parent.
High-Quality Toll Road.
From a technical perspective, the short- to medium-term trend for Hess Midstream is bearish. As of late 2025, the stock is trading at approximately $33.85, which is significantly below both its 200-day moving average of ~$38.93 and its 50-day moving average of ~$36.77. This positioning indicates negative price momentum. The stock has been under persistent pressure following a series of analyst downgrades and the ongoing uncertainty related to the Chevron-Hess merger, which has created a technical overhang on the shares. While the company's recent distribution increase is a fundamental positive, it has not been sufficient to reverse the negative price trend. In the short-term, the stock is likely to remain in its current downtrend or consolidate until a significant positive catalyst emerges to shift market sentiment.
Technically Bearish.
View Hess Midstream LP (HESM) stock page
Loading the interactive version of this report…