Monro offers strategic-buyout upside and an 8.89% dividend yield, but weak traffic, negative cash flow, and covenant risk make it a highly asymmetric turnaround bet.
Monro Inc. operates as a leading national provider of retail automotive repair and tire services in the United States, managing a network of 1,115 company-operated retail stores and 47 franchised locations across 32 states as of June 2026 [cite: 1, 2, 3]. The company’s footprint is concentrated in the Mid-Atlantic and New England regions, with additional store clusters across portions of the Great Lakes, Midwest, Southeast, and Western United States [cite: 2]. Operating under a single, integrated reporting segment, the company generates its revenues through two primary commercial engines: in-store retail service bays and selective commercial fleet accounts [cite: 1]. In fiscal 2026, the company generated approximately $\$1.157\text{ billion}$ in total sales [cite: 3, 4, 5, 6].
Monro's core product and service portfolio consists of replacement tires and tire-related services, undercar repair, and routine maintenance [cite: 1]. Tires represent the largest single category, accounting for approximately 48% of total retail sales in fiscal 2026 [cite: 6]. Undercar repairs and routine maintenance drive the remaining 52% of sales, encompassing brakes, steering, drive trains, suspension systems, exhausts, alignments, battery installations, and oil changes [cite: 1]. The physical retail network is operated under several recognized regional brand flags, including Tire Choice Auto Service Centers, Mr. Tire Auto Service Centers, Monro Auto Service and Tire Centers, Tire Warehouse Tires for Less, Car-X Tire & Auto, Ken Towery's Tire & Auto Care, Mountain View Tire & Auto Service, and Tire Barn Warehouse [cite: 1]. Typical store formats are free-standing structures featuring dedicated sales desks, parts and tire storage, and multiple service bays equipped with above-ground electric vehicle lifts [cite: 1]. In addition to these retail locations, Monro operates two commercial tire retread facilities [cite: 1].
| Revenue Category | Primary Product & Service Offerings | Revenue Contribution (FY2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Replacement Tires | Passenger, light truck, and commercial tires spanning premium Tier 1 to entry-level Tier 4 brands; mounting, balancing, and flat repair [cite: 1, 7, 8]. | ~48% [cite: 6] |
| Undercar Repair | Brakes, exhaust systems, mufflers, steering, suspension, and complex drive train repairs [cite: 1]. | ~28% |
| Routine Maintenance | Oil changes, fluid flushes, scheduled maintenance, and wheel alignment [cite: 1]. | ~15% |
| Other Services | Batteries, electrical diagnostic work, and franchise royalties from Car-X locations [cite: 1]. | ~9% |
The company serves two primary customer types: individual retail consumers and local/regional commercial fleet operators [cite: 1]. The passenger car and light truck replacement tire and service end markets are highly resilient, driven by the nondiscretionary nature of automotive repair and vehicle age dynamics [cite: 1]. Individual consumers are motivated to select Monro over alternative channels due to its unique value proposition, which combines the professionalism, broad tire availability, and nationwide warranty coverage of a large national retailer with the trust and local proximity of a neighborhood repair garage [cite: 4, 5]. To reinforce this trust, Monro equips its technicians with its proprietary ConfiDrive digital inspection tool, which generates visual, photographic reports on vehicle health for customers, reducing the perceived opacity of automotive service [cite: 8, 9].
Monro’s top-line revenue is driven by three core variables: comparable-store sales (comps), ticket size, and physical customer traffic [cite: 8]. Over the past fiscal year, positive ticket growth, which rose by approximately 4% in the latest quarter, has acted as a primary buffer against mid-single-digit declines in store traffic [cite: 8]. On the operational front, profitability is highly sensitive to technician labor scheduling and retail occupancy leverage [cite: 4, 8, 10].
To improve store performance amidst a challenging consumer backdrop, management has partnered with external consultants, including AlixPartners, to execute a structured Operational Improvement Plan [cite: 6, 8]. This turnaround program focuses on three distinct operational initiatives:
1. Profitable Customer Acquisition & Digital CRM: Monro has integrated machine learning models into its Customer Relationship Management (CRM) engine [cite: 8]. This allows the company to optimize the timing and value of promotional offers based on customer transaction histories, yielding higher conversion rates on marketing expenditures [cite: 8].
2. Targeted Regional Interventions: Rather than applying uniform nationwide pricing, Monro is executing localized market programs [cite: 8]. For instance, a targeted regional intervention in South Florida combining localized oil change pricing adjustments and localized digital spending drove a significant increase in physical unit volumes [cite: 8].
3. District Manager and Store-Level Toolkits: Management has expanded its specialized store-level toolkit from 100 locations to 340 locations [cite: 8]. These toolkits empower regional managers to run local store operations, address localized margin leakages, and improve in-store conversion rates [cite: 8].
Monro possesses a narrow, localized economic moat anchored to its regional scale and vendor purchasing advantages [cite: 1, 11]. The company’s scale allows it to secure direct sourcing agreements with global tire manufacturers and national parts distributors, yielding lower material costs than independent single-location shops can achieve [cite: 1, 11]. However, the business lacks switching costs, as customer loyalty remains highly transactional and driven by convenience, immediate tire availability, and promotional pricing [cite: 1].
The U.S. automotive repair and maintenance market represents a massive, non-discretionary segment of consumer spending, historically estimated at over $\$100\text{ billion}$ annually [cite: 12]. Considering that Monro serviced approximately 3.8 million vehicles in fiscal 2026 within a total U.S. passenger vehicle park of approximately $280\text{ million}$ units, the company captures a highly fragmented market share of roughly $1.4\%$ [cite: 1, 2]. The average age of light vehicles in the United States has reached a record high of nearly 12.5 years, a structural trend that expands the addressable market for out-of-warranty, third-party maintenance [cite: 1].
Monro competes in a fragmented landscape against several distinct categories of players:
* National Tire and Service Chains: Consolidators such as Mavis, Discount Tire, and Bridgestone-owned Firestone centers [cite: 9, 13].
* Quick Lube and Specialty Operators: High-velocity service chains such as Valvoline Inc. and Driven Brands [cite: 12].
* Auto Parts Retailers: Do-it-for-me (DIFM) and do-it-yourself (DIY) retail chains such as O'Reilly Automotive, AutoZone, and Advance Auto Parts [cite: 14, 15].
Relative to its peers, Monro has recently lost ground [cite: 15, 16]. While national parts retailers like O'Reilly have maintained positive traffic and sales momentum, Monro’s retail-centric service centers have been disproportionately impacted by consumer deferrals of discretionary repairs [cite: 8, 15, 16]. In response, the Board of Directors has initiated a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives [cite: 8, 17]. Working with financial advisors from Bank of America and Solomon Partners, the Board is evaluating potential avenues to maximize shareholder value, including a potential sale of the company, regional asset monetization, or refinancing [cite: 8].
Monro's latest reported financial results are for the first quarter of fiscal 2027, which ended June 27, 2026, and were announced on July 29, 2026 [cite: 3, 5, 18, 19].
During the quarter, Monro generated sales of $\$287.1\text{ million}$ USD, representing a 4.6% decline compared to sales of $\$301.0\text{ million}$ USD in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 [cite: 3, 5, 18]. This decline was driven by a $\$9.0\text{ million}$ USD reduction in sales from the prior closure of 145 underperforming stores in fiscal 2026, compounded by a 1.7% decrease in comparable-store sales from continuing locations [cite: 3, 5, 18]. In terms of Wall Street expectations, revenue of $\$287.13\text{ million}$ USD was nearly in-line with the consensus estimate of $\$287.73\text{ million}$ USD, missing by a narrow $0.21\%$ or $\$0.60\text{ million}$ USD [cite: 20].
However, profitability missed consensus forecasts by a wide margin [cite: 20]. Monro reported an adjusted diluted loss per share of $-\$0.09$ USD, compared with the consensus analyst estimate for a profit of $+\$0.03$ USD [cite: 20]. This represented a negative earnings surprise of $-\$0.12$ USD per share [cite: 20]. On a GAAP basis, the net loss for the quarter narrowed to $-\$2.1\text{ million}$ USD (diluted loss per share of $-\$0.08$ USD), compared to a GAAP net loss of $-\$8.1\text{ million}$ USD (diluted loss per share of $-\$0.28$ USD) in the prior-year period, primarily due to lapping elevated store closing costs [cite: 3, 5, 18].
| Product/Service Category | Q1 FY2027 Comp Store Sales | Demand Dynamics & Management Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Batteries | +8.0% | Supported by improvements in in-store stocking levels and front-of-shop presentation [cite: 3, 5, 8]. |
| Alignments | +1.0% | Steady execution; relatively nondiscretionary for tire wear mitigation [cite: 3, 5, 8]. |
| Front End / Shocks | +1.0% | Driven by safety concerns, though highly sensitive to deferred spending [cite: 3, 5, 8]. |
| Brakes | -1.0% | Impacted by consumer deferral of higher-ticket repairs [cite: 3, 5, 8]. |
| Replacement Tires | -1.0% | Flat tire unit volumes; gains in premium Tier 1 market share offset by lower tier demand [cite: 3, 5, 8]. |
| Maintenance Services | -5.0% | Pressured by consumers deferring non-essential routine fluid changes and checkups [cite: 3, 5, 8]. |
Gross margin for the quarter decreased by 50 basis points to 35.0% [cite: 3, 5, 18]. This contraction was driven by 90 basis points of occupancy cost deleverage as fixed store rents were spread over lower sales volumes [cite: 8]. This deleverage was partially offset by a 40 basis point reduction in technician labor costs as a percentage of sales, which was achieved through labor scheduling optimizations [cite: 8].
Total operating expenses decreased to $\$96.7\text{ million}$ USD (33.7% of sales) compared to $\$113.0\text{ million}$ USD (37.5% of sales) in the prior-year quarter [cite: 3, 5]. This reduction was driven by lapping $\$17.8\text{ million}$ USD in store closing costs and a $\$3.7\text{ million}$ USD reduction in consulting expenses related to the Operational Improvement Plan [cite: 3, 5, 8]. These cost reductions were offset by a deliberate $\$4.9\text{ million}$ USD increase in marketing investment to support customer acquisition, as well as $\$4.6\text{ million}$ USD in higher store-level wages [cite: 3, 8]. Operating income improved to $\$3.7\text{ million}$ USD (1.3% of sales) compared to an operating loss of $-\$6.1\text{ million}$ USD in the prior-year period, though adjusted operating income declined to $\$2.2\text{ million}$ USD from $\$14.0\text{ million}$ USD [cite: 3, 5, 18].
Monro did not provide formal fiscal 2027 financial guidance [cite: 5]. However, management reaffirmed its expectation that full-year comparable store sales will rise and that full-year gross margin will remain consistent with fiscal 2026, with margin expansion expected in the second half of the year as fixed costs are leveraged [cite: 20]. Capital expenditures were guided to a range of $\$25\text{ million}$ USD to $\$35\text{ million}$ USD for fiscal 2027 [cite: 7, 8, 9, 20].
CEO Peter Fitzsimmons commented that Q1 was "undeniably difficult," attributing the soft traffic to extended geopolitical tensions in the Middle East that drove crude oil prices higher, thereby squeezing consumer discretionary budgets and reducing miles driven [cite: 8, 9]. Fitzsimmons also noted that consumers continued to trade down to lower-priced products and defer higher-ticket repair items like brakes [cite: 8].
The earnings release had a negative impact on the stock price, with shares falling 5.35% in premarket trading on the day of the announcement, dropping from $\$17.20$ USD to $\$16.28$ USD [cite: 20]. The stock continued to drift lower, closing at $\$12.54$ USD as of September 9, 2026 [cite: 21]. Despite this downward pressure, sell-side analyst recommendations remain at a consensus "BUY" rating [cite: 22], with average analyst price targets indicating approximately 77% upside from current trading levels (implying a consensus target of approximately $\$22.20$ USD) [cite: 23].
To evaluate Monro's underlying business model, investors must focus on several core metrics:
* Stagnant Sales CAGR: Monro's 5-year sales growth CAGR stands at $-2.2\%$, reflecting a persistent contraction in organic store traffic and ongoing store rationalization [cite: 24].
* Capital Structure and Leverage: The company operated with a significant working capital deficit of $\$281.2\text{ million}$ USD as of March 28, 2026 [cite: 1]. This deficit is structured through a voluntary supplier finance program, under which suppliers can receive early payments from financial institutions, resulting in a recognized supplier obligation of $\$205.9\text{ million}$ USD as of June 27, 2026 [cite: 1, 18].
* Cash Flow and Debt Covenants: Cash flow from operations was negative at $-\$30.4\text{ million}$ USD for Q1 fiscal 2027 [cite: 18]. To fund operations and pay dividends, Monro raised net borrowings under its credit facility by $\$48.4\text{ million}$ USD, increasing long-term debt to $\$108.4\text{ million}$ USD against a reduced total facility capacity of $\$400\text{ million}$ USD [cite: 18].
* Covenant Step-Up: Under its amended credit facility, Monro's minimum interest coverage ratio covenants scale up immediately:
* Fourth Quarter FY2026 through First Quarter FY2027: $1.25\text{x}$ [cite: 25].
* Second Quarter FY2027 and thereafter: $1.55\text{x}$ [cite: 25].
* Dividend Sustainability: The company continues to distribute a quarterly dividend of $\$0.28$ per share, representing an annualized payout of $\$1.12$ per share [cite: 8, 18]. On a share price of $\$12.54$ USD, this yields a high forward dividend yield of 8.89% [cite: 21, 23]. However, the credit facility mandates a minimum liquidity cushion of $\$200.0\text{ million}$ USD to declare dividends, placing this payout at risk if cash generation does not improve [cite: 18].
Monro's primary execution risk centers on its Operational Improvement Plan [cite: 6]. The company has closed 145 underperforming stores and continues to monetize these assets, generating $\$2.7\text{ million}$ USD from real estate sales in the latest quarter [cite: 18]. However, if the remaining store base fails to generate positive comparable store sales, the company's fixed rent and occupancy costs will continue to deleverage, compounding its cash burn [cite: 8]. Furthermore, labor productivity is a critical risk; technician wage inflation could offset any gains achieved through scheduling optimization [cite: 4, 8, 10].
The automotive service aftermarket is experiencing structural consolidation, with private equity-backed platforms aggressively expanding their footprints [cite: 12]. Competitors like Mavis have built dense regional networks, allowing them to leverage digital marketing and local parts distribution more efficiently than Monro [cite: 9, 12]. If competitors sustain high levels of promotional spending, Monro could be forced to increase its discount rates, further compressing gross margins [cite: 8, 20].
Although Monro is not exposed to individual customer concentration, it faces substantial customer segment risk [cite: 1]. The company's core retail customer base is highly sensitive to changes in real disposable income [cite: 20]. Elevated fuel and grocery prices have forced consumer trade-offs, driving a mix shift toward lower-margin Tier 4 tires (which rose to 30% of tire sales from 25% in the prior year) and causing customers to defer non-discretionary maintenance [cite: 7, 8].
Monro is subject to strict environmental laws governing the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials [cite: 1]. In fiscal 2026, the company recycled approximately 1.6 million gallons of waste oil and 3.1 million scrap tires [cite: 1]. Any compliance failures or environmental contamination events could result in substantial legal liabilities [cite: 1]. Additionally, shifts in global trade policies and import tariffs on private-label tires from Asian manufacturing hubs could impact the landing costs of its value tire inventory [cite: 26].
With negative operating cash flow of $-\$30.4\text{ million}$ USD in Q1 fiscal 2027 and a working capital deficit of $\$281.2\text{ million}$ USD, Monro has a fragile liquidity profile [cite: 1, 18]. The company's $\$108.4\text{ million}$ USD credit facility carries variable interest rates, exposing it to interest rate risk [cite: 18]. The step-up in the interest coverage covenant to $1.55\text{x}$ in the second quarter of fiscal 2027 reduces the company's financial flexibility [cite: 25]. If EBITDA deteriorates further, Monro could be forced to eliminate its dividend to remain in compliance [cite: 18, 25].
This five-year projection models Monro's financial trajectory through Fiscal 2031, using a current base share price of $\$12.54$ USD and a normalized post-preferred-conversion common share count of 31.25 million shares [cite: 21, 27, 28, 29]. All scenarios incorporate the simplified capital structure following the conversion of all 19,664 Class C preferred shares into 1.20 million common shares in June 2026 [cite: 18].
In this scenario, the Board’s strategic review successfully results in a buyout by a private equity sponsor or strategic consolidator [cite: 8, 9]. Alternatively, the Operational Improvement Plan drives a robust organic recovery as inflation cools [cite: 6, 8]:
* Operating Drivers: Revenue grows at a $3.5\%$ CAGR over five years, reaching $\$1.374\text{ billion}$ USD by Year 5, driven by a recovery in store traffic [cite: 8]. Gross margins expand to $38.0\%$ as technician labor leverage improves and occupancy costs are optimized [cite: 8].
* Financial Outputs: Year 5 EBITDA margins reach $11.0\%$, generating EBITDA of $\$151.1\text{ million}$ USD. Net income expands to $\$50.0\text{ million}$ USD, resulting in an EPS of $\$1.60$ USD.
* Valuation Bridge: The market applies a $20.0\text{x}$ P/E multiple, reflecting premium transaction values in recent automotive services transactions [cite: 12, 15]. The implied future share price is $\$32.00$ USD. Assuming the quarterly dividend is maintained at $\$0.28$ per share, cumulative 5-year dividends total $\$5.60$ USD [cite: 4, 5].
* Total Return: The projected total return is calculated using the formula:
$\text{Total Return} = \frac{\text{Future Price} + \text{Cumulative Dividends}}{\text{Current Price}} - 1 = \frac{\$32.00 + \$5.60}{\$12.54} - 1 = 199.8\%$
The annualized return is $24.6\%$.
In this scenario, Monro continues to operate as an independent public company, stabilizing its store network but struggling to capture significant volume growth:
* Operating Drivers: Revenue grows at a modest $1.0\%$ CAGR, reaching $\$1.216\text{ billion}$ USD by Year 5, as pricing increases offset minor traffic declines [cite: 8]. Gross margins stabilize at $35.5\%$ [cite: 8, 20].
* Financial Outputs: Year 5 EBITDA margins reach $8.0\%$, resulting in EBITDA of $\$97.3\text{ million}$ USD. Year 5 net income is projected at $\$25.0\text{ million}$ USD, yielding an EPS of $\$0.80$ USD.
* Valuation Bridge: The stock trades at a $16.0\text{x}$ P/E multiple, in line with its historical trading averages. The implied future share price is $\$12.80$ USD. To preserve cash and support credit covenants, management reduces the annual dividend to $\$0.80$ per share starting in Year 2 [cite: 18], resulting in cumulative 5-year dividends of $\$4.48$ USD.
* Total Return:
$\text{Total Return} = \frac{\$12.80 + \$4.48}{\$12.54} - 1 = 37.8\%$
The annualized return is $6.6\%$.
In this scenario, the turnaround plan fails, fuel costs remain structurally high, and the Board does not find a strategic buyer [cite: 8, 20]:
* Operating Drivers: Comps decline over the five-year horizon, resulting in a negative CAGR of $-2.0\%$ [cite: 24]. Year 5 revenue contracts to $\$1.046\text{ billion}$ USD. Severe occupancy cost deleverage and wage inflation compress gross margins to $32.0\%$ [cite: 4, 8, 10].
* Financial Outputs: Year 5 EBITDA margins compress to $5.0\%$, yielding EBITDA of $\$52.3\text{ million}$ USD. The company runs near GAAP break-even, with Year 5 EPS of $\$0.10$ USD.
* Valuation Bridge: The P/E multiple contracts to $10.0\text{x}$, reflecting structural distress. The implied future share price is $\$1.00$ USD. Under covenant pressures, the board suspends the dividend in Year 2 [cite: 18, 25], resulting in cumulative dividends of $\$1.12$ USD.
* Total Return:
$\text{Total Return} = \frac{\$1.00 + \$1.12}{\$12.54} - 1 = -83.1\%$
The annualized return is $-30.0\%$.
Applying subjective probability weights of 25% to the High Case, 55% to the Base Case, and 20% to the Low Case yields a probability-weighted price target of $15.24 USD in Year 5.
$P_{\text{weighted}} = (0.25 \times \$32.00) + (0.55 \times \$12.80) + (0.20 \times \$1.00) = \$15.24\text{ USD}$
| Scenario | Revenue in Year 5 | Margin / Earnings Assumption | Valuation Multiple Assumption | Current Share Price | Implied Future Share Price | 5-Year Total Return | Annualized Return | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | $1,374.0M | 11.0% EBITDA / $1.60 EPS | 20.0x P/E | $12.54 [cite: 21] | $32.00 | 199.8% | 24.6% | 25% |
| Base | $1,216.0M | 8.0% EBITDA / $0.80 EPS | 16.0x P/E | $12.54 [cite: 21] | $12.80 | 37.8% | 6.6% | 55% |
| Low | $1,046.0M | 5.0% EBITDA / $0.10 EPS | 10.0x P/E | $12.54 [cite: 21] | $1.00 | -83.1% | -30.0% | 20% |
HIGH ASYMMETRIC VOLATILITY
The transition of Peter Fitzsimmons to a permanent employment contract with a $\$900,000$ USD base salary and performance-tied incentives indicates a commitment to long-term stabilization [cite: 11]. Non-employee directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines equal to three times their annual cash retainer, and all were in compliance as of March 28, 2026 [cite: 11]. However, the recent separation from the former CEO highlights structural leadership transition risk [cite: 26].
The revenue base is highly exposed to consumer discretionary budgets, with consumers demonstrating a shift toward low-margin Tier 4 tires and deferring essential repair services [cite: 7, 8, 20]. The company has also experienced a negative 5-year sales growth CAGR of $-2.2\%$, showing long-term top-line pressure [cite: 24].
While Monro maintains a large regional network of 1,115 stores [cite: 1, 3], it operates in a highly fragmented market and has lost market share to more capitalized competitors like Mavis and national auto parts retail platforms [cite: 9, 12, 15].
Near-term growth remains constrained by declining store traffic [cite: 8]. Preliminary July 2026 comparable store sales were down approximately 1%, suggesting that operational initiatives have not yet fully stabilized top-line traffic [cite: 8, 20].
Financial health is pressured by a persistent working capital deficit of $\$281.2\text{ million}$ USD [cite: 1]. Negative operating cash flow of $-\$30.4\text{ million}$ USD in Q1 fiscal 2027 required additional credit facility borrowings, raising long-term debt to $\$108.4\text{ million}$ USD [cite: 18].
The underlying business remains viable, as automotive parts replacement and repair are nondiscretionary needs driven by an aging vehicle fleet [cite: 1]. However, labor constraints and fixed retail occupancy costs remain key structural headwind factors [cite: 4, 8, 10].
Management continues to prioritize quarterly dividend payments of $\$0.28$ per share, consuming approximately $\$9.0\text{ million}$ USD in cash quarterly despite negative operating cash flows [cite: 8, 18]. This funding strategy limits the cash available to support guided fiscal 2027 capital expenditures of $\$25\text{ million}$ USD to $\$35\text{ million}$ USD [cite: 7, 9, 18, 20].
Sell-side analysts maintain a cautious stance, with downgrades reflecting concerns regarding the company's elevated forward P/E multiple relative to its current negative GAAP earnings trajectory and store traffic challenges [cite: 15, 17].
Adjusted operating margin remains below 1.0%, reflecting significant occupancy cost deleverage and a shift in the sales mix toward lower-margin tires [cite: 3, 5, 7, 18].
Monro's historical track record is characterized by a multi-year decline in sales and profit margins, resulting in weak long-term shareholder value creation and leading to the closure of 145 stores [cite: 3, 4, 5, 24].
The blended qualitative score is calculated as a simple average of the ten individual metrics:
$\text{Blended Score} = \frac{6+4+5+4+3+6+4+3+4+3}{10} = 4.2 / 10$
STRUCTURALLY WEAK PROFILE
Monro's investment case is defined by a conflict between weak standalone fundamentals and significant activist-driven strategic optionality.
STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVES PLAY
Monro's stock price displays a bearish technical profile, closing at $\$12.54$ USD on September 9, 2026, and trading significantly below its declining 200-day moving average [cite: 21]. This downward pressure was accelerated by the first-quarter fiscal 2027 earnings miss and continuing declines in store traffic [cite: 8, 20]. In the short term, the stock is expected to remain range-bound with a downward bias [cite: 8, 20]. Any significant upward momentum in the stock will depend on announcements from the ongoing strategic alternatives review or a stabilization of comparable store sales [cite: 8].
BEARISH MOMENTUM PERSISTS
View Monro, Inc. (MNRO) stock page
Loading the interactive version of this report…