Rockwell is transforming from a cyclical automation leader into a software-enhanced, AI-enabled factory digitization platform—but its premium valuation now depends on flawless execution of a $2 billion manufacturing pivot.
Rockwell Automation Inc (NYSE: ROK) is the leading global pure-play provider of industrial automation, power, control, and digital transformation solutions.[1, 2] The company reported its second-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings results on May 5, 2026, delivering substantial outperformance relative to consensus Wall Street estimates across both top-line and bottom-line metrics.[3, 4] For the three months ended March 31, 2026, Rockwell reported actual revenues of \$2.239 billion, representing a 11.9% year-over-year increase compared to the \$2.001 billion reported in the second quarter of fiscal 2025.[4, 5] Diluted earnings per share climbed 40% year-over-year to \$3.10, up from \$2.22 in the prior-year period.[5] Adjusted EPS rose 32% year-over-year to \$3.30, beating the consensus estimate of \$2.88 by \$0.42.[4, 5]
This strong performance reflects robust demand within several short-cycle end markets, most notably in data centers, semiconductors, and e-commerce warehouse automation.[4, 6] This growth was supported by the rapid commercialization of the company's autonomous mobile robot offerings.[7, 8] Backed by solid volume gains, positive pricing realization above input costs, and favorable product mix, Rockwell’s enterprise operating margin expanded by 350 basis points year-over-year to 22.5%.[5, 9]
| Financial Parameter | Q2 FY26 Actual | Q2 FY25 Actual | Year-over-Year Change (%) / Basis Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Reported Sales | \$2.239 Billion | \$2.001 Billion | +11.9% [5] |
| Organic Sales Growth | +9.0% | - | - [5] |
| Enterprise Operating Profit | \$504 Million | \$381 Million | +32.3% [5] |
| Enterprise Operating Margin | 22.5% | 19.0% | +350 bps [5] |
| GAAP Net Income (Attributable to ROK) | \$350 Million | \$252 Million | +38.9% [5] |
| GAAP Diluted EPS | \$3.10 | \$2.22 | +39.6% [5] |
| Adjusted EPS | \$3.30 | \$2.50 | +32.0% [5] |
| Free Cash Flow | \$275 Million | \$171 Million | +60.8% [5] |
Sources: [5, 9]
Following the strong results, corporate management raised full-year fiscal 2026 guidance, targeting a reported sales growth range of 5% to 9% and raising the Adjusted EPS midpoint to \$12.80.[5, 6] This positive performance is occurring alongside a major multi-year strategic transition.[8] Rockwell is shifting from its historically asset-light operational model to an asset-intense model, backed by a \$2 billion five-year capital investment program.[8, 9] The centerpiece of this program is the development of a 1-million-square-foot "Factory of the Future" in New Berlin, Wisconsin, designed to show the commercial viability of fully autonomous manufacturing under a "ROK on ROK" framework.[10, 11] Concurrently, the completed dissolution of the Sensia joint venture with SLB on April 1, 2026, streamlines Rockwell’s corporate footprint, removing a lower-margin process automation drag and positioning the Lifecycle Services segment for margin expansion.[5, 6, 12]
Rockwell Automation manages its operations through three reporting segments: Intelligent Devices, Software & Control, and Lifecycle Services.[5] During the second quarter of fiscal 2026, Intelligent Devices generated 44.6% of sales, Software & Control represented 30.5%, and Lifecycle Services contributed 24.4%.[5, 13]
The three operating segments showed distinct organic growth trends and varying levels of profitability.[5]
| Operating Segment | Q2 FY26 Revenue (\$M) | Organic Sales Growth (%) | Q2 FY26 Operating Margin (%) | Q2 FY25 Operating Margin (%) | Margin Expansion / Contraction (bps) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligent Devices | \$1,000 | +9.0% | 20.9% | 17.7% | +320 [5] |
| Software & Control | \$684 | +17.0% | 34.9% | 30.1% | +480 [5] |
| Lifecycle Services | \$547 | -1.0% | 14.6% | 14.5% | +10 [5] |
Sources: [5]
The Intelligent Devices segment benefited from positive pricing power and strong volume gains in the motion control, safety, and sensing product lines.[4, 6] This growth was also supported by project wins in the power control division, such as the Ferri Systems desalination project in Africa, which integrated Rockwell’s compact motor control systems.[14] Within Software & Control, organic growth of 17% exceeded expectations.[4] This expansion was driven by double-digit demand for Logix programmable logic controllers (PLCs), particularly from North American data center builders.[4] This trend is highlighted by a recent contract win with ATS Automation to replace commercial-grade controls with Logix PLCs at a new AI-focused data center in Texas.[7] Lifecycle Services remained flat sequentially as customers deferred larger long-cycle process projects.[4, 6] However, the segment was supported by book-to-bill strength of 1.07 and recurring service agreements.[4, 6]
Rockwell maintains a dominant market share of over 50% in the North American PLC market.[13] This dominant position is protected by high customer switching costs.[13] Factory operators face substantial capital expenses, retraining costs, and operational downtime risks when attempting to migrate from Rockwell’s Allen-Bradley control ecosystem to competing platforms like Siemens.[13, 15] This lock-in is supported by an exclusive distributor network that provides local technical support and parts availability, reinforcing the competitive barrier.[13]
Furthermore, the integration of operational technology (OT) with information technology (IT) is driving higher-value software sales.[13] Product additions such as the Logix L9 processor and the Process IO family, launched in fiscal 2025, have accelerated the modernization of legacy equipment.[16] On the software side, applications like Plex Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) and Fiix cloud-native maintenance platforms are driving Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) growth.[7, 17] In the second quarter of fiscal 2026, total ARR grew 6% year-over-year, with software-specific ARR expanding at a high-single-digit pace.[4, 6] Prometeon Tyre Group, for example, recently selected Fiix as its global digital maintenance platform to standardize asset management across its manufacturing facilities.[7]
Rockwell is capitalizing on a major resurgence in warehouse automation and e-commerce fulfillment, which grew 60% in the first quarter of fiscal 2026.[8] This growth is supported by the company's acquisitions of Clearpath and OTTO Motors.[8] The integration of these businesses allows Rockwell to offer autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) that can replace traditional automated guided vehicles (AGVs) and manual forklifts.[7, 8] These AMR solutions are seeing increased adoption in the automotive, food and beverage, and data center sectors.[7] Clearpath and OTTO Motors are growing at double-digit rates and are on track to achieve profitability in the second half of fiscal 2026, which should reduce previous margin headwinds.[8]
To demonstrate the efficiency of autonomous manufacturing in high-cost labor regions, Rockwell is implementing a significant capital transition.[8] Shifting from its historical asset-light model, the company is executing a \$2 billion five-year capital investment cycle.[8, 11] This began with pilot programs in Singapore and Twinsburg, Ohio, and is culminating in a flagship 1-million-square-foot campus in New Berlin, Wisconsin.[8, 10]
The New Berlin facility will serve as a showcase for Rockwell’s products.[10] Under the "ROK on ROK" framework, the factory will utilize Rockwell's own controls, robotics, digital twins, and partner technologies to manufacture its product portfolio.[10] This project represents a direct capital investment of \$211 million to \$246 million on a 177-acre site.[10] Heavy construction is scheduled to run from March 2027 through September 2028, with full commercial operations expected to begin in January 2029.[10]
Rockwell’s growth strategy is aligned with expanding total addressable markets across several key automation, computing, and software segments.[18, 19]
| Addressable Market Segment | 2026 Estimated Value (\$B) | 2030 Projected Value (\$B) | Projected CAGR (%) | Strategic Alignment / Core Offering |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering Software | \$75.34 Billion | \$127.05 Billion | 14.0% | configuration and visualization software; digital twins [1, 20] |
| Embedded Automation Computers | \$48.27 Billion | \$67.61 Billion | 8.8% | Industrial PCs, Logix controllers, edge gateways [1, 19] |
| Remote Monitoring & Control | \$32.41 Billion | \$42.18 Billion | 6.8% | SCADA, FactoryTalk View SE, remote diagnostics [17, 21] |
| Discrete Automation Market | \$6.70 Billion | \$8.22 Billion | 5.2% | PLCs, motion control, factory safety systems [1, 22] |
| Port Predictive Maintenance | \$1.44 Billion | \$2.87 Billion | 18.8% | CMMS, Fiix cloud software, condition-based monitoring [1, 18] |
Sources: [18, 19, 20, 21, 22]
Rockwell's performance in fiscal 2026 follows a period of cyclicality, highlighted by inventory destocking and capital expenditure constraints in late fiscal 2024.[8, 16]
| Fiscal Year | Total Sales (\$B) | Annual Sales Growth (%) | Segment Operating Margin (%) | Net Income attributable to ROK (\$M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | \$6.997 Billion | +10.5% | - | - |
| 2022 | \$7.760 Billion | +10.9% | - | \$918 Million (Recast) |
| 2023 | \$9.058 Billion | +16.7% | - | \$1,372 Million (Recast) |
| 2024 | \$8.264 Billion | -8.8% | 19.3% | \$937 Million (Recast) |
| 2025 | \$8.342 Billion | +0.9% | 20.4% | \$869 Million |
Sources: [16, 23, 24]
The company experienced a demand contraction in fiscal 2024 as customers normalized high inventory levels built during supply chain disruptions.[8, 16] However, the recovery in fiscal 2025, combined with the momentum seen in the first half of fiscal 2026, indicates that this inventory normalization cycle has largely concluded, with actual customer demand recovering across key verticals.[4, 16]
In late fiscal 2025, Rockwell updated its financial metrics to improve reporting visibility.[12] First, it began excluding legacy asbestos defense and environmental indemnity costs from Adjusted Income and Adjusted EPS, as these liabilities are unrelated to ongoing manufacturing operations.[12] Second, engineering and development expenses—previously embedded in the cost of sales—were reclassified as a separate line item to provide better visibility into R&D spending.[12]
Concurrently, the completed dissolution of the Sensia joint venture on April 1, 2026, required Rockwell to classify Sensia’s remaining assets and liabilities as held for sale.[9] In the quarter ended December 31, 2025, current assets held for sale were \$258 million against current liabilities of \$65 million.[25] While this divestiture reduces overall sales growth by approximately 1.5% in the second half of fiscal 2026, it is margin-accretive to Lifecycle Services and neutral to EPS.[5, 6]
In the second quarter of fiscal 2026, GAAP net income attributable to Rockwell grew to \$350 million, up from \$252 million in the prior-year quarter.[5] Pre-tax margin reached 19.7%, compared to 14.9% in the second quarter of fiscal 2025.[5] This margin expansion was driven by positive price-over-cost realization, volume gains, and corporate cost-control actions.[5, 9]
Free cash flow for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 reached \$275 million, up from \$171 million in the prior-year period.[5] Cash provided by operating activities climbed to \$320 million, supported by higher pre-tax income, though partially offset by working capital requirements from strong Q2 shipments.[5, 6] Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) also improved.[5] GAAP ROIC for the twelve months ended March 31, 2026, rose to 16.5% from 15.2% in the prior-year period, while Adjusted ROIC expanded to 17.2% from 14.2%.[5] This reflects the company's focus on capital efficiency even as it executes its U.S. investment program.[5, 9]
Rockwell continues to trade at a valuation premium relative to its diversified industrial peers.[8]
| Company | NTM EV / EBITDA | NTM P / E | TTM Revenue (\$B) | Gross Profit Margin (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell Automation (ROK) | 21.17x | 29.12x | \$8.80 Billion | 48.5% [26, 27] |
| Emerson Electric (EMR) | 15.54x | - | \$18.31 Billion | - [8, 26] |
| Schneider Electric | 16.50x | - | \$35.60 Billion | - [8, 28] |
| Siemens AG / Energy | 17.74x | - | \$92.11 Billion | - [8, 26] |
Sources: [8, 24, 26, 28]
Rockwell's premium valuation is supported by its pure-play exposure to North American industrial automation, its dominant position in the domestic PLC market, and its higher proportion of software-derived recurring revenues.[8, 13]
Rockwell remains sensitive to broader capital expenditure cycles.[8] In long-cycle industries like chemical processing and energy, customers continue to defer larger greenfield projects, prioritizing smaller productivity and modernization upgrades instead.[4, 6] This deferral activity exposes Rockwell to downside risk if a broader economic slowdown delays these larger modernization programs.
While the recent reduction in heavy equipment tariffs (from 25% to 15%) has been positive for industrial buyers, management has flagged ongoing trade and tariff policy uncertainty as a potential headwind for the second half of fiscal 2026.[4, 29] Additionally, geopolitical conflicts in the Middle East have paused near-term customer activity in the Lifecycle Services business, although the financial impact has been limited to date.[7]
Rockwell is facing regulatory headwinds from international tax reforms.[9] The implementation of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Pillar Two minimum tax rules, particularly affecting its manufacturing operations in Singapore, has raised the company's adjusted effective tax rate from 17.7% in the prior year to 20.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2026.[5, 9] This tax rate increase represents a persistent drag on adjusted net income growth.[5]
Rockwell's balance sheet carries high leverage, which could restrict capital deployment if credit conditions tighten.[30]
$\text{Total Debt} = \$3.689 \text{ Billion} \quad \text{vs.} \quad \text{Total Shareholder Equity} = \$3.576 \text{ Billion} \quad \text{[30]}$
$\text{Debt-to-Equity Ratio} = 103.2\% \quad \text{(up from 94.1\% five years ago)} \quad \text{[30]}$
$\text{Short-Term Commercial Paper Outstanding} = \$1.025 \text{ Billion (at } 4.00\% \text{ weighted interest)} \quad \text{[9]}$
$\text{Interest Coverage Ratio} = \frac{\text{EBIT}}{\text{Interest Expense}} = 12.5\times \quad \text{[30]}$
$\text{Operating Cash Flow Debt Coverage} = 41.6\% \quad \text{[30]}$
The \$1.025 billion in outstanding short-term commercial paper carries a weighted average maturity of 28 days, exposing the company to refinancing risks if interest rates rise.[9] However, the current interest coverage ratio of 12.5x indicates that the company generates sufficient earnings to service its debt obligations.[30]
Executive compensation is closely tied to shareholder return metrics.[31] For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2025, CEO Blake Moret received total compensation of \$13,998,274, consisting of a \$1,210,456 base salary, a \$1,737,610 cash bonus, \$3,300,010 in stock options, and \$7,700,421 in direct stock awards.[32] Moret directly owns 0.085% of outstanding shares, valued at approximately \$43.80 million (~89,92k shares).[31]
However, insider transaction activity over the past six months shows significant selling by key executives under pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plans.[3]
| Executive / Insider | Corporate Title | L6M Direct Purchases | L6M Direct Sales | Shares Liquidated | Estimated Value (\$M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake D. Moret | President & CEO | 0 | 12 | 70,693 | \$27.77 Million [3] |
| Scott Genereux | Chief Revenue Officer | 0 | 16 | 19,343 | \$7.82 Million [3] |
| Christopher Nardecchia | Chief Information Officer | 0 | 8 | 15,686 | \$6.42 Million [3] |
| Rebecca W. House | Chief People & Legal Officer | 0 | 15 | 14,520 | \$5.86 Million [3] |
| Robert L. Buttermore | Chief Supply Chain Officer | 0 | 15 | 9,780 | \$3.90 Million [3] |
Sources: [3]
Additionally, senior vice president of Lifecycle Services Matthew Fordenwalt executed sales under a 10b5-1 plan in June 2026, selling 377 shares at \$460.51 while retaining 4,437 shares.[33, 34] Chief IP Counsel John Miller also liquidated shares in late May 2026.[33] These systematic liquidations represent a key sentiment metric, indicating that while executives are executing on operations, they are also systematically reducing their equity exposure.[3]
To evaluate the long-term potential of Rockwell Automation through the end of the decade, three scenarios have been modeled: Base Case, Bull Case, and Bear Case.
The table below outlines the key financial metrics and probability distributions for each of the three modeled scenarios.
| Forecasting Parameter | Bull Case Scenario | Base Case Scenario | Bear Case Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned Probability | 25% | 55% | 20% |
| Projected Revenue CAGR | 7.5% - 9.0% | 4.5% - 5.5% | 1.0% - 2.5% |
| Target FY30 Operating Margin | 24.5% - 25.5% | 21.5% - 22.5% | 18.0% - 19.5% |
| Software ARR (% of Sales) | 15.0% - 18.0% | 11.0% - 12.0% | 8.0% - 9.0% |
| Wisconsin COG Yield | High efficiency; margin expansion. | On-schedule; target yield. | Delayed; capital overrun. |
| NTM P/E Multiple Target | 32.0x - 34.0x | 27.0x - 29.0x | 20.0x - 22.0x |
Sources: [8]
The Base Case assumes that the U.S. manufacturing reshoring trend continues at its current pace, and short-cycle hardware demand stabilizes.[8] Software ARR grows at a high-single-digit rate, reaching 12% of overall sales by 2030.[8] The New Berlin facility opens on schedule in January 2029, and early operational efficiencies help offset BEPS Singapore tax headwinds and general inflation.[9, 10] Operating margins stabilize near 22.0%, and revenue grows at a 4.8% compound annual rate.[8]
The Bull Case assumes accelerated U.S. industrial reshoring, supported by favorable trade policies and regulatory incentives.[35] Factory-of-the-future initiatives experience rapid adoption, driving double-digit organic growth for Software & Control.[36] The New Berlin facility achieves full "ROK on ROK" automation by fiscal 2029, pushing company-wide operating margins past 24.5%.[10] Clearpath and OTTO Motors AMRs expand into new industrial verticals, driving warehouse sales growth of over 30% per year.[4, 8] Under this scenario, revenue grows at an 8.5% compound annual rate, and the valuation multiple expands as software revenue increases.
The Bear Case assumes persistent macroeconomic inflation and higher interest rates cause capital-intensive manufacturing companies to defer factory modernization plans.[8, 16] Escalating global trade conflicts and supply chain disruptions raise input costs for memory and key electronic components, compressing margins.[4] Construction at the Wisconsin facility experiences delays and cost overruns, while high leverage restricts Rockwell's capital flexibility.[10, 30] Revenue growth slows to a 1.5% compound annual rate, and operating margins compress below 19.5%.
To evaluate Rockwell Automation's operational and structural characteristics, the company's core components have been scored on a scale from 1 (severe weakness) to 10 (exceptional strength).
| Strategic Evaluation Pillar | Score (1-10) | Core Qualitative Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Moat & Customer Lock-in | 9.5 / 10 | 50%+ North American PLC share; high switching and retraining costs.[13] |
| Technology Innovation & R&D Execution | 8.5 / 10 | Agentic AI; Logix L9 processors; integrated digital twin software.[8, 16] |
| Subscription ARR Pipeline Expansion | 8.0 / 10 | Cloud-native software (Fiix, Plex); recurring services.[7, 13] |
| Capital Allocation & Project Execution | 6.5 / 10 | \$2B investment cycle; New Berlin construction risk.[8, 10] |
| Balance Sheet Strength & Debt Profile | 5.5 / 10 | Debt-to-equity of 103.2%; short-term commercial paper exposure.[9, 30] |
| Geographic and Sector Concentration | 6.0 / 10 | 60% revenue concentration in North America; short-cycle dependency.[13] |
Rockwell’s dominant position in the North American industrial control sector is supported by significant switching costs.[13] Once a factory standardizes on the Allen-Bradley control system, migrating to a competitor's PLC platform is highly complex, requiring extensive engineering hours, retraining, and operational downtime risks.[13, 15] This is further reinforced by an exclusive distributor network that provides local support, creating a strong barrier to entry.[13]
The integration of Agentic AI at Level 2 and Level 3 of the factory floor allows Rockwell to offer a strong value proposition.[8] Unlike generic, cloud-based AI, Rockwell's models process closed-loop, proprietary machine data generated by its installed base of controllers and Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES).[8] This localized data environment allows the system to analyze machine health, predict failures, and execute self-healing protocols in real time, minimizing costly unplanned downtime.[8]
The transition toward software-defined automation and recurring subscriptions provides stable revenue.[8, 15] Software subscriptions through Plex and Fiix, along with recurring maintenance services, are growing at a high-single-digit pace.[6, 13] This recurring revenue stream now accounts for 10% of total sales, adding predictability to Rockwell's historically cyclical top-line model.[8]
The \$2 billion capital expenditure cycle is structurally designed to support long-term capacity and expand operating margins.[8, 9] However, this pivot to an asset-intense model requires significant capital and operational focus over the next five years, which could restrict cash returns to shareholders if execution challenges arise.[8]
The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 103.2% and \$1.025 billion in short-term commercial paper outstanding represent financial risks.[9, 30] While current interest coverage is healthy, the high leverage restricts financial flexibility, especially during cyclical downturns when cash flow may be constrained.[30]
With nearly 60% of total revenues generated in North America, Rockwell is highly exposed to the capital spending cycles of U.S. industrial operators.[13] While this geographic exposure aligns with the current reshoring trend, it leaves the company vulnerable to any localized economic slowdown in the United States.
Rockwell Automation remains a key beneficiary of the long-term trends in factory automation, U.S. manufacturing reshoring, and the integration of digital technologies on the shop floor.[8, 13] The company's competitive position is supported by its large installed base and high switching costs in the North American PLC market.[13]
The company's investment thesis rests on three core elements:
1. Installed Base Defensive Advantage: The company's large installed base of control systems secures high-margin recurring software and services revenue.[8, 13] This base provides structural defense against cyclical industrial downturns.
2. Autonomous Manufacturing Showcase: The New Berlin, Wisconsin facility represents a major operational showcase.[10] If successful, this "Factory of the Future" will demonstrate the ROI of Rockwell's integrated AI, software, and robotics solutions to global clients, supporting long-term margin goals.[8, 10]
3. Software Portfolio and ARR Scaling: Rockwell's software portfolio, including Plex and Fiix, continues to grow.[7, 13] As ARR approaches 12% to 15% of the sales mix, the company's valuation multiple should be supported by more predictable cash flows.[8]
However, these opportunities must be balanced against high leverage, rising international taxes, and ongoing capital expenditure cycles.[8, 9, 30] Overall, Rockwell Automation remains a key player in the secular factory digitization trend, with its long-term valuation depending on the successful execution of its Wisconsin manufacturing project and the continued growth of its high-margin software business.[8, 10]
Disclaimer: This section is presented for analytical purposes only and does not contain, imply, or provide financial advice or investment recommendations.
As of the close of trading on June 5, 2026, Rockwell Automation’s share price stood at \$446.71, down 3.36% for the session.[37] The stock has established a 52-week trading range between \$305.44 and \$468.11, with the current price consolidated near its upper range.[37] Year-to-date, the stock has gained 14.81%, reflecting a strong post-earnings rally following the Q2 results on May 5, 2026.[29, 37]
A comparative analysis of moving averages shows the current price position relative to short-, medium-, and long-term trends.[38, 39, 40]
| Technical Parameter | Simple Moving Average (SMA) | Exponential Moving Average (EMA) | Price Alignment Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Period | \$448.67 - \$457.14 | \$449.34 | Below short-term moving average.[38, 39] |
| 10-Day Period | \$453.56 | \$452.13 | Below short-term support.[39] |
| 20-Day Period | \$451.01 - \$457.76 | \$454.87 | Below intermediate trend line.[38, 39] |
| 50-Day Period | \$418.83 - \$456.58 | \$454.64 | Above medium-term support levels.[38, 39, 40] |
| 100-Day Period | \$407.65 - \$449.52 | \$450.85 | Testing long-term structural support.[38, 39] |
| 200-Day Period | \$388.75 - \$441.36 | \$439.13 | Above major support; indicates longer-term uptrend.[38, 39, 40] |
Sources: [38, 39, 40]
The following support and resistance levels are established based on classic and Fibonacci pivot calculation models.
| Metric | Support 3 (S3) | Support 2 (S2) | Support 1 (S1) | Pivot Point | Resistance 1 (R1) | Resistance 2 (R2) | Resistance 3 (R3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classic Pivot | \$440.04 | \$442.73 | \$444.77 | \$447.46 | \$449.49 | \$452.19 | \$454.22 [39] |
| Fibonacci Pivot | \$442.73 | \$444.54 | \$445.66 | \$447.46 | \$449.26 | \$450.38 | \$452.19 [39] |
| Woodie's Pivot | \$439.72 | \$442.57 | \$444.45 | \$447.30 | \$449.17 | \$452.03 | \$453.90 [39] |
Following the second-quarter earnings release on May 5, 2026, Wall Street analysts revised their target prices upwards, reflecting increased confidence in short-cycle demand and operational margin execution.[29, 34]
| Investment Research Firm | Updated Target Price | Previous Target Price | Rating Position / Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Stanley | \$525.00 | \$440.00 | Overweight [3, 29] |
| BNP Paribas Exane | \$515.00 | - | Outperform [29] |
| KeyCorp | \$510.00 | \$470.00 | Overweight [34] |
| Citigroup | \$500.00 | \$466.00 | Buy [34] |
| Goldman Sachs | \$487.00 | - | Neutral [29] |
| Barclays | \$480.00 | \$400.00 | Equal Weight [3, 29] |
| HSBC | \$490.00 | \$445.00 | Overweight [34] |
| Wells Fargo | \$440.00 | \$360.00 | Equal Weight [3, 34] |
| TD Cowen | \$400.00 | \$350.00 | Hold [34] |
| Jefferies | \$380.00 | \$490.00 | Hold (Downgraded on valuation) [27, 41] |
Among the 29 analysts covering Rockwell, the consensus rating is a "Moderate Buy," with a median target price of \$462.17, indicating that the stock is currently trading near fair value estimates.[34, 42, 43]
In the short term, Rockwell Automation is consolidating near its 200-day moving average support range of \$439.13 to \$441.36.[39] A failure to hold this support level could lead the stock to test its medium-term 50-day moving average support near \$418.83.[40] Conversely, if buyers regain momentum, technical resistance is expected near the classic pivot point of \$447.46, with stronger overhead resistance at the 52-week high of \$468.11.[37, 39] Consolidating these support levels will be key to establishing the stock's near-term trading range.
View Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) stock page
Loading the interactive version of this report…